PokeVideoPlayer v0.9-rev1 - licensed under gpl3-or-later
Oh no, the video couldn't be loaded :(
You can try refreshing the page!
...
Views : 5,464,965
Genre: Education
Date of upload: Mar 7, 2023 ^^
Rating : 4.778 (17,314/294,555 LTDR)
94.45% of the users lieked the video!!
5.55% of the users dislieked the video!!
User score: 91.67- Overwhelmingly Positive
RYD date created : 2024-08-02T03:18:57.801312Z
See in json
Top Comments of this video!! :3
⚠⚠⚠This is a VERY MISLEADING VIDEO. ⚠⚠⚠
It tends to let you think that Chernobyl will be a problem for billions of years. That is not the case! Uranium 238 is not the problem here, just remember it exists in nature and it is weakly radioactive.
The problem of Chernobyl is the highly radioactive material that makes up the corium, not U238. It was extremely radioactive indeed after the explosion but its half life is a lot shorter: decades, maybe centuries, but certainly not billions of years. Chernobyl has already lost a significant part of its radioactivity.
Remember:
If the half life is long, the radioactivity is weak.
If the radioactivity is strong, the half life is short.
It is very misleading to mix both and this video is as close to a lie as it can be without actually being a lie.
5.3K |
This is extremely misleading. Uranium-238 is extremely weakly radioactive, and is non-fissile material, meaning it is generally unwanted in nuclear fuel. A subtance's radioactivity is directly an inverse function of its half-life. If you radiate all your energy, you dont have any energy left to radiate. The candle that's twice as bright burns half as long.
Even fissile uranium is fairly weakly radioactive, with U-235--the enriched fissile fuel in reactors--having a half-life of over 700 million years. It actually poses a greater danger of chemical toxicity than radiation damage.
Most of the concern for radioactive contamination comes from internal exposure to alpha radiation from ingestion of Caesium-137 and Strontium-90. These isotopes have half-lives of ~30 years. The disaster happened in 1986, so 38 years have passed, meaning ~46% of these isotopes remains in the environment. In 100 years, only 4% will remain. There are significant concerns regarding dispersal of particulate and aerosol contaminants, as well as accumulation in the water systems and food chain, but these threats can only last as long as the contaminants. It is also worth noting that there are plans for a cleanup effort, where the remaining reactor corium will be safely stored away in a brand-new long-term nuclear waste storage facility.
Low-level radiation poses no discernable health effects below doses of 100 mSv per year. Official estimates regarding the long-term health impacts of remaining radioactive contamination are based on the highly conservative Linear No-Threshold (LNT) model, which supposes that there is no such threshold below which radiation damage is reparable by the body.
As a matter of fact, it has been shown that the psychological and psychosomatic effects of fear of radiation are--in many cases that don't involve direct exposure to a catastrophic nuclear event--far more damaging than the radiation itself. The public is literally worrying themselves sick due to anti-nuclear fearmongering.
TL;DR - This video sucks ngl lol. Uninformed fearmongering.
302 |
U238 may have an obscenely long half life, but that also means it has an extremely low level of radioactivity (it'll kill you faster by chemical toxicity!) The actual problem with the Chernobyl reactor are all the stuff in it that has a much shorter half life, and therefore is outputting much more powerful radiation. Think of it like a lightbulb: if you have a set number of kilowatt hours, you can shine a little bit for a long time or a lot for a short time. U238 is a tiny LED, some of the stuff in the Elephant's Foot is a floodlight.
1.3K |
@mind-of-neo
1 year ago
i want youtube to start automatically linking the full video from which a short was extracted. EDIT: i know they've added this feature in since i made this comment. thank you
38K |